[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c8964d3c-41b1-8b70-5731-45d58ee6a4f8@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 01:12:13 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, ast@...nel.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull-request: bpf-next 2017-12-18
On 12/22/2017 03:42 PM, David Miller wrote:
> From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
> Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2017 00:48:22 +0100
>
>> Looks good, one thing: If I spot this correctly, isn't here a ...
>>
>> prog->aux->jit_data = jit_data;
>>
>> ... missing? Otherwise the context from the initial pass is neither
>> saved for the extra pass nor freed.
>
> Good catch, here is an updated patch:
>
> ====================
> bpf: sparc64: Add JIT support for multi-function programs.
>
> Modelled strongly upon the arm64 implementation.
>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Applied to bpf-next, thanks David!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists