[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <b2cf1e8d-fc1d-4ffb-efec-fafe641c3a49@iogearbox.net>
Date: Thu, 28 Dec 2017 00:05:10 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] libbpf: break loop earlier
On 12/27/2017 09:30 PM, Eric Leblond wrote:
> On Wed, 2017-12-27 at 11:00 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 27, 2017 at 07:02:28PM +0100, Eric Leblond wrote:
>>> Get out of the loop when we have a match.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Eric Leblond <eric@...it.org>
>>> ---
>>> tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c | 1 +
>>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>>> index 5fe8aaa2123e..d263748aa341 100644
>>> --- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>>> +++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf.c
>>> @@ -412,6 +412,7 @@ bpf_object__init_prog_names(struct bpf_object
>>> *obj)
>>> prog->section_name);
>>> return -LIBBPF_ERRNO__LIBELF;
>>> }
>>> + break;
>>
>> why this is needed?
>
> It was just cosmetic, no related bug.
>
>> The top of the loop is:
>> for (si = 0; si < symbols->d_size / sizeof(GElf_Sym) && !name;
>>
>> so as soon as name is found the loop will exit.
>
> OK, I've missed that. Please disregard this patch.
Ok, please respin the series one last time w/o this patch then.
Please also keep the already given ACKs on the other patches.
Thanks, Eric!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists