[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20171231161513.25785-11-idosch@mellanox.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:15:04 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 10/19] ipv6: Report dead flag during route dump
Up until now the RTNH_F_DEAD flag was only reported in route dump when
the 'ignore_routes_with_linkdown' sysctl was set. This is expected as
dead routes were flushed otherwise.
The reliance on this sysctl is going to be removed, so we need to report
the flag regardless of the sysctl's value.
Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
net/ipv6/route.c | 3 +++
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 0927b02b2819..4d0d32309bcc 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -4049,6 +4049,9 @@ static size_t rt6_nlmsg_size(struct rt6_info *rt)
static int rt6_nexthop_info(struct sk_buff *skb, struct rt6_info *rt,
unsigned int *flags, bool skip_oif)
{
+ if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)
+ *flags |= RTNH_F_DEAD;
+
if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN) {
*flags |= RTNH_F_LINKDOWN;
if (rt->rt6i_idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown)
--
2.14.3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists