netdev - [RFC PATCH net-next 09/19] ipv6: Ignore dead routes during lookup

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20171231161513.25785-10-idosch@mellanox.com>
Date:   Sun, 31 Dec 2017 18:15:03 +0200
From:   Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
To:     netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, dsahern@...il.com, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, mlxsw@...lanox.com,
        Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH net-next 09/19] ipv6: Ignore dead routes during lookup

Currently, dead routes are only present in the routing tables in case
the 'ignore_routes_with_linkdown' sysctl is set. Otherwise, they are
flushed.

Subsequent patches are going to remove the reliance on this sysctl and
make IPv6 more consistent with IPv4.

Before this is done, we need to make sure dead routes are skipped during
route lookup, so as to not cause packet loss.

Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
---
 net/ipv6/route.c | 18 ++++++++++++++----
 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/ipv6/route.c b/net/ipv6/route.c
index 2bef8d1f279d..0927b02b2819 100644
--- a/net/ipv6/route.c
+++ b/net/ipv6/route.c
@@ -474,6 +474,8 @@ static struct rt6_info *rt6_multipath_select(struct rt6_info *match,
 			if (route_choosen == 0) {
 				struct inet6_dev *idev = sibling->rt6i_idev;
 
+				if (sibling->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)
+					break;
 				if (sibling->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN &&
 				    idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown)
 					break;
@@ -499,12 +501,15 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *rt6_device_match(struct net *net,
 	struct rt6_info *local = NULL;
 	struct rt6_info *sprt;
 
-	if (!oif && ipv6_addr_any(saddr))
-		goto out;
+	if (!oif && ipv6_addr_any(saddr) && !(rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD))
+		return rt;
 
 	for (sprt = rt; sprt; sprt = rcu_dereference(sprt->rt6_next)) {
 		struct net_device *dev = sprt->dst.dev;
 
+		if (sprt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)
+			continue;
+
 		if (oif) {
 			if (dev->ifindex == oif)
 				return sprt;
@@ -533,8 +538,8 @@ static inline struct rt6_info *rt6_device_match(struct net *net,
 		if (flags & RT6_LOOKUP_F_IFACE)
 			return net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry;
 	}
-out:
-	return rt;
+
+	return rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD ? net->ipv6.ip6_null_entry : rt;
 }
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_IPV6_ROUTER_PREF
@@ -680,6 +685,9 @@ static struct rt6_info *find_match(struct rt6_info *rt, int oif, int strict,
 	bool match_do_rr = false;
 	struct inet6_dev *idev = rt->rt6i_idev;
 
+	if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)
+		goto out;
+
 	if (idev->cnf.ignore_routes_with_linkdown &&
 	    rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_LINKDOWN &&
 	    !(strict & RT6_LOOKUP_F_IGNORE_LINKSTATE))
@@ -2153,6 +2161,8 @@ static struct rt6_info *__ip6_route_redirect(struct net *net,
 	fn = fib6_lookup(&table->tb6_root, &fl6->daddr, &fl6->saddr);
 restart:
 	for_each_fib6_node_rt_rcu(fn) {
+		if (rt->rt6i_nh_flags & RTNH_F_DEAD)
+			continue;
 		if (rt6_check_expired(rt))
 			continue;
 		if (rt->dst.error)
-- 
2.14.3