netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tuntap: XDP transmission

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <924ad2d8-42be-0d18-f8e6-99f823440aa1@redhat.com>
Date:   Tue, 2 Jan 2018 11:32:08 +0800
From:   Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To:     Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, kbuild test robot <lkp@...el.com>
Cc:     kbuild-all@...org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mst@...hat.com, jbrouer@...hat.com,
        Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] tuntap: XDP transmission



On 2018年01月01日 11:55, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-01-01 at 11:48 +0800, kbuild test robot wrote:
>> Hi Jason,
>>
>> I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
>>
>> [auto build test WARNING on net-next/master]
>>
>> url:    https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jason-Wang/XDP-transmission-for-tuntap/20180101-105946
>> config: i386-randconfig-x072-201800 (attached as .config)
>> compiler: gcc-7 (Debian 7.2.0-12) 7.2.1 20171025
>> reproduce:
>>          # save the attached .config to linux build tree
>>          make ARCH=i386
>>
>> All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>>
>>     drivers//net/tun.c: In function 'tun_xdp_to_ptr':
>>>> drivers//net/tun.c:251:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>>       return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr | TUN_XDP_FLAG);
>>              ^
>>     drivers//net/tun.c: In function 'tun_ptr_to_xdp':
>>     drivers//net/tun.c:257:9: warning: cast to pointer from integer of different size [-Wint-to-pointer-cast]
>>       return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr & ~TUN_XDP_FLAG);
>>              ^
>>
>> vim +251 drivers//net/tun.c
>>
>>     248	
>>     249	void *tun_xdp_to_ptr(void *ptr)
>>     250	{
>>   > 251		return (void *)((unsigned long)ptr | TUN_XDP_FLAG);
> Does TUN_XDP_FLAG really need to be 0x1ULL?
> Wouldn't 0x1UL suffice?
>

0x1UL should be fine.

Thanks