[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <740db82a-b64d-6d6e-33ae-4dec88eb985c@mellanox.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jan 2018 21:59:38 +0800
From: Chris Mi <chrism@...lanox.com>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: gerlitz.or@...il.com, stephen@...workplumber.org
Subject: Re: [patch iproute2 v3 1/4] lib/libnetlink: Add a function
rtnl_talk_msg
> On 12/25/17 2:46 AM, Chris Mi wrote:
>> diff --git a/lib/libnetlink.c b/lib/libnetlink.c
>> index 00e6ce0c..f5f675cf 100644
>> --- a/lib/libnetlink.c
>> +++ b/lib/libnetlink.c
>> @@ -581,36 +581,21 @@ static void rtnl_talk_error(struct nlmsghdr *h, struct nlmsgerr *err,
>> strerror(-err->error));
>> }
>>
>> -static int __rtnl_talk(struct rtnl_handle *rtnl, struct nlmsghdr *n,
>> - struct nlmsghdr **answer,
>> - bool show_rtnl_err, nl_ext_ack_fn_t errfn)
>> +static int __rtnl_check_ack(struct rtnl_handle *rtnl, struct nlmsghdr **answer,
> Make this function __rtnl_talk_msg. Include the assignment of nlmsg_seq
> and ack setting using the for loop below and sendmsg() call. All of that
> code can be common for both the single and multiple iov case.
Thanks for your suggestion. Done.
>
>> + bool show_rtnl_err, nl_ext_ack_fn_t errfn,
>> + unsigned int seq)
>> {
>> int status;
>> - unsigned int seq;
>> - struct nlmsghdr *h;
>> + char *buf;
> Please order variables in the reverse xmas tree style used in the net code.
Actually, I divide the variables in two parts, none-struct variables and
struct variables.
Not sure if that meets the reverse xmac tree style, but I think it is
more readable.
>
>> struct sockaddr_nl nladdr = { .nl_family = AF_NETLINK };
>> - struct iovec iov = {
>> - .iov_base = n,
>> - .iov_len = n->nlmsg_len
>> - };
>> + struct nlmsghdr *h;
>> + struct iovec iov;
>> struct msghdr msg = {
>> .msg_name = &nladdr,
>> .msg_namelen = sizeof(nladdr),
>> .msg_iov = &iov,
>> .msg_iovlen = 1,
>> };
>> - char *buf;
>> -
>> - n->nlmsg_seq = seq = ++rtnl->seq;
>> -
>> - if (answer == NULL)
>> - n->nlmsg_flags |= NLM_F_ACK;
>> -
>> - status = sendmsg(rtnl->fd, &msg, 0);
>> - if (status < 0) {
>> - perror("Cannot talk to rtnetlink");
>> - return -1;
>> - }
>>
>> while (1) {
>> status = rtnl_recvmsg(rtnl->fd, &msg, &buf);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists