[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180103111611.GB21230@xora-haswell>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 11:16:11 +0000
From: graeme.gregory@...aro.org
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Cc: Marcin Wojtas <mw@...ihalf.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, davem@...emloft.net,
linux@...linux.org.uk, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
f.fainelli@...il.com, antoine.tenart@...e-electrons.com,
thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com,
gregory.clement@...e-electrons.com,
ezequiel.garcia@...e-electrons.com, nadavh@...vell.com,
neta@...vell.com, ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org, jaz@...ihalf.com,
tn@...ihalf.com
Subject: Re: [net-next: PATCH v2 5/5] net: mvpp2: enable ACPI support in the
driver
On Sun, Dec 31, 2017 at 08:23:54PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > * Modify way of obtaining interrupts - with ACPI they are resources
> > bound to struct platform_device and it's not possible to obtain
> > them directly from the child node. Hence a formula is used, depending
> > on the port_id and number of possible CPUs.
>
> Hi Marcin
>
> I know nothing about ACPI. Is this limitation with respect to
> interrupts fundamental to ACPI, or just that nobody has implemented
> flexible interrupt support yet?
>
The infrastructure is there to traverse trees of children, but I don't
think there any helper functions.
Graeme
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists