lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180103142724.GE1402@alphalink.fr>
Date:   Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:27:24 +0100
From:   Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To:     James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Cc:     Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] l2tp: add peer_offset parameter

On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:59:44PM +0000, James Chapman wrote:
> I just realised the peer_offset attribute changes are already applied in
> net-next. (I missed these when they were submitted just before Christmas.)
> Should these commits be reverted? We probably don't want v4.15 to get an
> additional l2tp peer_offset attribute if we are going to remove it and the
> rest of the code supporting configurable offset attributes in the next
> release.
> 
Yes, I agree for a revert. I'm sorry for Lorenzo's work but I'd rather
not expand the user API in this direction.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ