[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180103142724.GE1402@alphalink.fr>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:27:24 +0100
From: Guillaume Nault <g.nault@...halink.fr>
To: James Chapman <jchapman@...alix.com>
Cc: Lorenzo Bianconi <lorenzo.bianconi@...hat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
Hangbin Liu <liuhangbin@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] l2tp: add peer_offset parameter
On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 08:59:44PM +0000, James Chapman wrote:
> I just realised the peer_offset attribute changes are already applied in
> net-next. (I missed these when they were submitted just before Christmas.)
> Should these commits be reverted? We probably don't want v4.15 to get an
> additional l2tp peer_offset attribute if we are going to remove it and the
> rest of the code supporting configurable offset attributes in the next
> release.
>
Yes, I agree for a revert. I'm sorry for Lorenzo's work but I'd rather
not expand the user API in this direction.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists