[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <cb5e1c62-9f71-b6ef-8a67-d094ce5c8f16@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 10:09:22 -0800
From: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: "lockless" qdisc breaks tx_queue_len change too?
On 01/02/2018 08:41 PM, Cong Wang wrote:
> Hi, John
>
> While reviewing your ptr_ring fix again today, it looks like your
> "lockless" qdisc patchset breaks dev->tx_queue_len behavior.
>
> Before your patchset, dev->tx_queue_len is merely an integer to read,
> after your patchset, the skb array has to be resized when
> dev->tx_queue_len changes, but I don't see any qdisc code handles
> this...
>
> Also, because of that, I doubt __skb_array_empty() in
> pfifo_fast_dequeue() can be safe any more even with your ptr_ring fix.
>
> What am I missing?
>
I dropped support for tx_queue_len changes after qdisc has been
created. The only check is at init time when building the qdisc.
Before this series teql and pfifo_fast were the only qdiscs that
used tx_queue_len other qdiscs used other mechanisms or copied
tx_queue_len at init time. So the API is inconsistent.
OK, but arguably its kAPI now and needs to be supported on live
qdiscs. So couple options drop the __skb_array_empty() check,
stop supporting changes on running qdiscs, or do a qdisc swap
with the new array.
I'm tempted to make the qdisc swap work, still need benchmarks
I guess without the empty check. Either way to get it working
we need a callback from tx_queue_len code paths.
Unfortunately, I guess someone somewhere probably uses pfifo_fast
and changes there queue length with a script after creating the
qdisc and expects it to work.
> Thanks.
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists