[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180103212222.17378-5-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:22:11 -0800
From: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net
Cc: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
nhorman@...hat.com, sassmann@...hat.com, jogreene@...hat.com,
Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
Subject: [net-next 04/15] i40evf: release bit locks in reverse order
From: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Although not strictly necessary, it is customary to reverse the order in
which we release locks that we acquire. This helps preserve lock
ordering during future refactors, which can help avoid potential
deadlock situations.
Signed-off-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@...el.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@...el.com>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
index e15ec95260a1..85e2232af750 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/i40evf/i40evf_main.c
@@ -1960,8 +1960,8 @@ static void i40evf_reset_task(struct work_struct *work)
adapter->aq_required |= I40EVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_MAC_FILTER;
adapter->aq_required |= I40EVF_FLAG_AQ_ADD_VLAN_FILTER;
- clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CRITICAL_TASK, &adapter->crit_section);
clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CLIENT_TASK, &adapter->crit_section);
+ clear_bit(__I40EVF_IN_CRITICAL_TASK, &adapter->crit_section);
i40evf_misc_irq_enable(adapter);
mod_timer(&adapter->watchdog_timer, jiffies + 2);
--
2.15.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists