[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180103155152.7e94a295@cakuba.netronome.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2018 15:51:52 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kubakici@...pl>
To: Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, jhs@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
mlxsw@...lanox.com, andrew@...n.ch,
vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com, f.fainelli@...il.com,
michael.chan@...adcom.com, ganeshgr@...lsio.com,
saeedm@...lanox.com, matanb@...lanox.com, leonro@...lanox.com,
idosch@...lanox.com, simon.horman@...ronome.com,
pieter.jansenvanvuuren@...ronome.com, john.hurley@...ronome.com,
alexander.h.duyck@...el.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
john.fastabend@...il.com, daniel@...earbox.net
Subject: Re: [patch net-next v4 00/10] net: sched: allow qdiscs to share
filter block instances
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 18:22:09 +0100, Jiri Pirko wrote:
> However I don't agree about breaking the existing filter add and show
> and also imposibility to make not-shared block shared in the runtime
> before defining it first.
FWIW I would agree with David that allowing add on a shared block
modify filters on another interface can break existing users. (No
opinion on dump and lifetime).
Powered by blists - more mailing lists