netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/11] bpf: Add write access to tcp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180104235533.3672006-4-brakmo@fb.com>
Date:   Thu, 4 Jan 2018 15:55:25 -0800
From:   Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
To:     netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     Kernel Team <kernel-team@...com>, Blake Matheny <bmatheny@...com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@...gle.com>,
        Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@...gle.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v4 03/11] bpf: Add write access to tcp_sock and sock fields

This patch adds a macro, SOCK_OPS_SET_FIELD, for writing to
struct tcp_sock or struct sock fields. This required adding a new
field "temp" to struct bpf_sock_ops_kern for temporary storage that
is used by sock_ops_convert_ctx_access. It is used to store and recover
the contents of a register, so the register can be used to store the
address of the sk. Since we cannot overwrite the dst_reg because it
contains the pointer to ctx, nor the src_reg since it contains the value
we want to store, we need an extra register to contain the address
of the sk.

Also adds the macro SOCK_OPS_GET_OR_SET_FIELD that calls one of the
GET or SET macros depending on the value of the TYPE field.

Signed-off-by: Lawrence Brakmo <brakmo@...com>
---
 include/linux/filter.h |  3 +++
 include/net/tcp.h      |  2 +-
 net/core/filter.c      | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 52 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/filter.h b/include/linux/filter.h
index 2b0df27..2e6e889 100644
--- a/include/linux/filter.h
+++ b/include/linux/filter.h
@@ -1005,6 +1005,9 @@ struct bpf_sock_ops_kern {
 		u32 replylong[4];
 	};
 	u32	is_fullsock;
+	u64	temp;			/* Used by sock_ops_convert_ctx_access
+					 * as temporary storaage of a register
+					 */
 };
 
 #endif /* __LINUX_FILTER_H__ */
diff --git a/include/net/tcp.h b/include/net/tcp.h
index 6939e69..108d16a 100644
--- a/include/net/tcp.h
+++ b/include/net/tcp.h
@@ -2010,7 +2010,7 @@ static inline int tcp_call_bpf(struct sock *sk, int op)
 	struct bpf_sock_ops_kern sock_ops;
 	int ret;
 
-	memset(&sock_ops, 0, sizeof(sock_ops));
+	memset(&sock_ops, 0, offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, temp));
 	if (sk_fullsock(sk)) {
 		sock_ops.is_fullsock = 1;
 		sock_owned_by_me(sk);
diff --git a/net/core/filter.c b/net/core/filter.c
index 7064862..978ac78 100644
--- a/net/core/filter.c
+++ b/net/core/filter.c
@@ -4470,6 +4470,54 @@ static u32 sock_ops_convert_ctx_access(enum bpf_access_type type,
 				      offsetof(OBJ, OBJ_FIELD));	      \
 	} while (0)
 
+/* Helper macro for adding write access to tcp_sock or sock fields.
+ * The macro is called with two registers, dst_reg which contains a pointer
+ * to ctx (context) and src_reg which contains the value that should be
+ * stored. However, we need an additional register since we cannot overwrite
+ * dst_reg because it may be used later in the program.
+ * Instead we "borrow" one of the other register. We first save its value
+ * into a new (temp) field in bpf_sock_ops_kern, use it, and then restore
+ * it at the end of the macro.
+ */
+#define SOCK_OPS_SET_FIELD(BPF_FIELD, OBJ_FIELD, OBJ)			      \
+	do {								      \
+		int reg = BPF_REG_9;					      \
+		BUILD_BUG_ON(FIELD_SIZEOF(OBJ, OBJ_FIELD) >		      \
+			     FIELD_SIZEOF(struct bpf_sock_ops, BPF_FIELD));   \
+		if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg)		      \
+			reg--;						      \
+		if (si->dst_reg == reg || si->src_reg == reg)		      \
+			reg--;						      \
+		*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_DW, si->dst_reg, reg,		      \
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,      \
+					       temp));			      \
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(			      \
+						struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,     \
+						is_fullsock),		      \
+				      reg, si->dst_reg,			      \
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,      \
+					       is_fullsock));		      \
+		*insn++ = BPF_JMP_IMM(BPF_JEQ, reg, 0, 2);		      \
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(			      \
+						struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk),\
+				      reg, si->dst_reg,			      \
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern, sk));\
+		*insn++ = BPF_STX_MEM(BPF_FIELD_SIZEOF(OBJ, OBJ_FIELD),	      \
+				      reg, si->src_reg,			      \
+				      offsetof(OBJ, OBJ_FIELD));	      \
+		*insn++ = BPF_LDX_MEM(BPF_DW, reg, si->dst_reg,		      \
+				      offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops_kern,      \
+					       temp));			      \
+	} while (0)
+
+#define SOCK_OPS_GET_OR_SET_FIELD(BPF_FIELD, OBJ_FIELD, OBJ, TYPE)	      \
+	do {								      \
+		if (TYPE == BPF_WRITE)					      \
+			SOCK_OPS_SET_FIELD(BPF_FIELD, OBJ_FIELD, OBJ);	      \
+		else							      \
+			SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD(BPF_FIELD, OBJ_FIELD, OBJ);	      \
+	} while (0)
+
 	case offsetof(struct bpf_sock_ops, snd_cwnd):
 		SOCK_OPS_GET_FIELD(snd_cwnd, snd_cwnd, struct tcp_sock);
 		break;
-- 
2.9.5