[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180105.102607.1479150123989462300.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Fri, 05 Jan 2018 10:26:07 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: edumazet@...gle.com
Cc: natale.patriciello@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
carloaugusto.grazia@...more.it
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/3] Revert "tcp: allow drivers to tweak TSQ logic"
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Date: Fri, 5 Jan 2018 03:44:20 -0800
> On Fri, Jan 5, 2018 at 3:32 AM, Natale Patriciello
> <natale.patriciello@...il.com> wrote:
>> There are a lot of drivers that are still outside the mainline, and it is
>> impossible to expect the authors (which in most cases do not maintain the
>> driver anymore) to check the best value for the device, and then to insert
>> it into the driver code. Moreover, if the users want to check or to use
>> other values, they have to recompile the driver (or the kernel).
>>
>
> This is nonsense
>
> I do not care of out of tree drivers.
>
> NACK.
Agreed, big NACK from me as well.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists