lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2018 17:12:59 +0100
From:   Nicolas Dichtel <nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com>
To:     Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, robsonde@...il.com,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Revert "xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read in
 xfrm_state_find."

Le 23/12/2017 à 17:09, Steffen Klassert a écrit :
> On Sat, Dec 23, 2017 at 10:56:12AM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>> From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
>> Date: Sat, 23 Dec 2017 10:22:17 +0100
>>
>>> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 11:00:40AM +0100, Steffen Klassert wrote:
>>>> This reverts commit c9f3f813d462c72dbe412cee6a5cbacf13c4ad5e.
>>>>
>>>> This commit breaks transport mode when the policy template
>>>> has widlcard addresses configured, so revert it.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
>>>
>>> David, can you please queue this one up for v4.14-stable?
>>> Commit ID is 94802151894d482e82c324edf2c658f8e6b96508
>>>
>>> v4.14 is unusable for some people without this revert.
>>
>> Yes, but it adds back the stack out-of-bounds bug.
>>
>> If I queue up the revert, I would also need to queue up whatever
>> follow-on you used to fix the out-of-bounds bug properly.  Which
>> commit is that?
> 
> This is commit ddc47e4404b58f03e98345398fb12d38fe291512
> ("xfrm: Fix stack-out-of-bounds read on socket policy lookup.")
> 
> It is included in the pull request for the net tree that
> I sent yesterday. The patch looks save, but not so sure
> if it should go directly to stable. These bugs reported by
> the syzbot are usually quite subtile and I already broke
> something when I tried to fix the original stack out-of-bounds
> bug. So maybe we should wait until the v4.15 release before
> backporting...
> 
This patch is still missing in the 4.14 stable. Without it, some IPsec scenarii
are broken. Is there a plan to queue this patch for the 4.14 stable ?


Thank you,
Nicolas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ