netdev - Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180105103139.2nh7dkszrmzatusv@gauss3.secunet.de>
Date:   Fri, 5 Jan 2018 11:31:39 +0100
From:   Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To:     Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
CC:     Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans_queue

On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 10:25:07PM +1100, Herbert Xu wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 04, 2018 at 12:20:26PM +0100, Artem Savkov wrote:
> 
> > Right, thats a better solution.
> > 
> > Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
> 
> Thanks!
> 
> But I just realised that this patch is based on my dirty tree.
> So here is a rebased version:
> 
> ---8<---
> We do not need locking in xfrm_trans_queue because it is designed
> to use per-CPU buffers.  However, the original code incorrectly
> used skb_queue_tail which takes the lock.  This patch switches
> it to __skb_queue_tail instead.
> 
> Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
> Fixes: acf568ee859f ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets...")
> Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>

Applied, thanks everyone!