netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net: hns3: Modify the update period of packet statistics

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sat, 6 Jan 2018 16:49:13 +0100
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     "lipeng (Y)" <lipeng321@...wei.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxarm@...wei.com,
        salil.mehta@...wei.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/20] net: hns3: Modify the update period of
 packet statistics

> >Is it because the static void is on the previous line?
> Yes, it is because the static void is on the previous line.
> 
> I can add one patch to fix the  previous line ,  and this patch will correct
> automatically.
> 
> do it need V2 patchset? or push a new patch after this patchset?

Thanks for looking into this. This actually seems like a patch bug,
but i think the consensus is to have the function type on the same
line as the function name within Linux.

No need for a v2. Just send followup patches.

   Andrew