netdev - Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:19:17 +0100
From:   SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To:     Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@...hat.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
        Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
        Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
        Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()

>> Two strings should be quickly put into a sequence by two function calls.
>> Thus use the function "seq_puts" instead of "seq_printf".
>>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> 
> Can you please explain what the issue really is and what you're trying
> to do here?

Is the function "seq_puts" a bit more efficient for the desired output
of a single string in comparison to calling the function "seq_printf"
for this purpose?


> One shouldn't need to dig into Coccinelle patterns to find
> out what you mean,

Why did an attribution for a software tool confuse you?


> and "strings should be quickly put into a sequence"
> isn't terribly helpful.

Which wording would you find more appropriate for the suggested
adjustment of these function calls?

Regards,
Markus