netdev - Re: [PATCH net-next 06/18] ipv6: Set nexthop flags during route creation

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ce5039b-c161-8960-766f-e1b8cbe97df8@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun, 7 Jan 2018 09:58:30 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
        nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com,
        yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 06/18] ipv6: Set nexthop flags during route
 creation

On 1/7/18 3:45 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> It is valid to install routes with a nexthop device that does not have a
> carrier, so we need to make sure they're marked accordingly.
> 
> As explained in the previous patch, host and anycast routes are never
> marked with the 'linkdown' flag.
> 
> Note that reject routes are unaffected, as these use the loopback device
> which always has a carrier.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> ---
>  net/ipv6/route.c | 3 +++
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>