[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e5b5bbd4-364b-4fd4-8dc7-14b6e0c5f68d@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 10:08:22 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com, weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 15/18] ipv6: Flush multipath routes when all
siblings are dead
On 1/7/18 3:45 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> By default, IPv6 deletes nexthops from a multipath route when the
> nexthop device is put administratively down. This differs from IPv4
> where the nexthops are kept, but marked with the RTNH_F_DEAD flag. A
> multipath route is flushed when all of its nexthops become dead.
>
> Align IPv6 with IPv4 and have it conform to the same guidelines.
>
> In case the multipath route needs to be flushed, its siblings are
> flushed one by one. Otherwise, the nexthops are marked with the
> appropriate flags and the tree walker is instructed to skip all the
> siblings.
>
> As explained in previous patches, care is taken to update the sernum of
> the affected tree nodes, so as to prevent the use of wrong dst entries.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 83 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------
> 1 file changed, 75 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists