[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180107.213017.689706436039823827.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Sun, 07 Jan 2018 21:30:17 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: idosch@...lanox.com
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, dsahern@...il.com,
roopa@...ulusnetworks.com, nicolas.dichtel@...nd.com,
weiwan@...gle.com, kafai@...com, yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org,
mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 00/18] ipv6: Align nexthop behaviour with IPv4
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Jan 2018 12:45:00 +0200
> This set tries to eliminate some differences between IPv4's and IPv6's
> treatment of nexthops. These differences are most likely a side effect
> of IPv6's data structures (specifically 'rt6_info') that incorporate
> both the route and the nexthop and the late addition of ECMP support in
> commit 51ebd3181572 ("ipv6: add support of equal cost multipath
> (ECMP)").
...
> Finally, this series also serves as a good first step towards David
> Ahern's goal of treating nexthops as standalone objects [2], as it makes
> the code more in line with IPv4 where the nexthop and the nexthop group
> are separate objects from the route itself.
...
Looks great, series applied, thanks Ido!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists