[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <66a18243-90fc-73c6-200a-fbbfa782d501@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 08:25:16 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>,
netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Cc: Bhumika Goyal <bhumirks@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
David Windsor <dwindsor@...il.com>,
Elena Reshetova <elena.reshetova@...el.com>,
Hans Liljestrand <ishkamiel@...il.com>,
Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@...el.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Roopa Prabhu <roopa@...ulusnetworks.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] atm/clip: Use seq_puts() in svc_addr()
>> @@ -708,11 +708,11 @@ static void svc_addr(struct seq_file *seq, struct sockaddr_atmsvc *addr)
>> static int e164[] = { 1, 8, 4, 6, 1, 0 };
>>
>> if (*addr->sas_addr.pub) {
>> - seq_printf(seq, "%s", addr->sas_addr.pub);
>> + seq_puts(seq, addr->sas_addr.pub);
>
> Which opens a lot of security concerns.
How? - The passed string is just copied into a buffer finally, isn't it?
> Never do this again.
Why do you not like such a small source code transformation at the moment?
> P.S. I'm wondering what would be first,
I am curious on how communication difficulties can be adjusted.
> Markus starts looking into the actual code,
I inspected the original source code to some degree.
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/fs/seq_file.c?id=895c0dde398510a5b5ded60e5064c11b94bd30ca#n682
https://elixir.free-electrons.com/linux/v4.15-rc6/source/fs/seq_file.c#L660
> or most (all) of the maintainers just ban him.
The change acceptance is varying for various reasons by the involved contributors.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists