[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47ddff01-23f9-5364-0dd4-b7c921512812@mellanox.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jan 2018 23:06:28 -0800
From: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
To: Andy Gospodarek <andy@...yhouse.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mchan@...adcom.com, talgi@...lanox.com, ogerlitz@...lanox.com,
Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v3 06/10] net/mlx5e: Change Mellanox references
in DIM code
On 01/08/2018 10:13 PM, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
> From: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
>
> Change all appropriate mlx5_am* and MLX5_AM* references to net_dim and
> NET_DIM, respectively, in code that handles dynamic interrupt
> moderation. Also change all references from 'am' to 'dim' when used as
> local variables and add generic profile references.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andy Gospodarek <gospo@...adcom.com>
> Acked-by: Tal Gilboa <talgi@...lanox.com>
> Acked-by: Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en.h | 9 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_dim.c | 14 +-
> .../net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_ethtool.c | 6 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_main.c | 40 ++-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/en_txrx.c | 8 +-
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/net_dim.c | 286 ++++++++++-----------
> drivers/net/ethernet/mellanox/mlx5/core/net_dim.h | 63 ++---
> 7 files changed, 225 insertions(+), 201 deletions(-)
>
[...]
>
> #define IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(val, ref) \
> (((100 * abs((val) - (ref))) / (ref)) > 10) /* more than 10% difference */
>
> -static int mlx5e_am_stats_compare(struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *curr,
> - struct mlx5e_rx_am_stats *prev)
> +static int net_dim_stats_compare(struct net_dim_stats *curr,
> + struct net_dim_stats *prev)
> {
> if (!prev->bpms)
> - return curr->bpms ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
> - MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
> + return curr->bpms ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
> + NET_DIM_STATS_SAME;
>
> if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->bpms, prev->bpms))
> - return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
> - MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
> + return (curr->bpms > prev->bpms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
> + NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;
>
Hey Andy,
I am currently reviewing a patch internally that fixes a bug in this
area, prev->ppms can be 0 and could cause IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF ouch !
same goes for prev->eppm, for some reason we had a broken assumption
that if ppms is 0 for some reason then the bpms is 0 and the above
condition will cover us.
Anyway the patch will go to net, which means when this series gets
accepted then net-next will fail to merge with net and we need to
manually push the fix to the new DIM library.
But for now I don't think anything is required for this series other
than bringing this division by 0 issue and the future merge conflict to
your attention.
> if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->ppms, prev->ppms))
> - return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
> - MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
> + return (curr->ppms > prev->ppms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
> + NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;
>
> if (IS_SIGNIFICANT_DIFF(curr->epms, prev->epms))
> - return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? MLX5E_AM_STATS_BETTER :
> - MLX5E_AM_STATS_WORSE;
> + return (curr->epms < prev->epms) ? NET_DIM_STATS_BETTER :
> + NET_DIM_STATS_WORSE;
>
> - return MLX5E_AM_STATS_SAME;
> + return NET_DIM_STATS_SAME;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists