[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110123148.GA21800@splinter>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 14:31:48 +0200
From: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...sch.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
davem@...emloft.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, pch@...bogen.com, jkbs@...hat.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/4] ipv6: Add support for non-equal-cost
multipath
On Tue, Jan 09, 2018 at 09:38:14PM -0700, David Ahern wrote:
> Also, have you considered support for sysctl_fib_multipath_hash_policy?
No, but I'm not sure what you expect it control? Note that unlike IPv4,
we have the flow label in the IP header, which we use for the multipath
hash.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists