[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180110152434.4ttwbawotojbvk7v@destiny>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 10:24:37 -0500
From: Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>, Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>,
rostedt@...dmis.org, mingo@...hat.com, davem@...emloft.net,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
ast@...nel.org, kernel-team@...com, daniel@...earbox.net,
linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org, darrick.wong@...cle.com,
Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v3 2/5] tracing/kprobe: bpf: Compare instruction
pointer with original one
On Wed, Jan 10, 2018 at 07:17:35PM +0900, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
> Compare instruction pointer with original one on the
> stack instead using per-cpu bpf_kprobe_override flag.
>
> This patch also consolidates reset_current_kprobe() and
> preempt_enable_no_resched() blocks. Those can be done
> in one place.
>
> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@...com>
Thanks,
Josef
Powered by blists - more mailing lists