[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <e1d61e39-7bc7-8968-0d90-65c62143c642@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2018 17:35:50 +0200
From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
To: Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH iproute2 0/7] ip6/tunnel: Unify tclass, flowlabel and
encap_limit output
Stephen Hemminger wrote:
> On Mon, 8 Jan 2018 19:06:31 +0200
> Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> With this series I want to improve printing of tclass,
>> flowlabel and encapsulation limit (encap_limit) options.
>>
>> Everything within this series is open for your comments,
>> suggestions and criticism.
>>
>> See individual patch description message for details.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Serhii
>>
>> Serhey Popovych (7):
>> ip6/tunnel: Fix tclass output
>> ip6tnl/tunnel: Do not print obscure flowinfo
>> ip6/tunnel: Unify tclass printing
>> ip6/tunnel: Unify flowlabel printing
>> ip6/tunnel: Unify encap_limit printing
>> gre6/tunnel: Output flowlabel after tclass
>> ip6tnl/tunnel: Output hoplimit before encapsulation limit
>>
>> ip/link_gre6.c | 54 ++++++++++++++++------------------------------
>> ip/link_ip6tnl.c | 63 ++++++++++++++++++------------------------------------
>> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 77 deletions(-)
>>
>
>
> I am confused. this patch series arrived after the v3 version.
> Which one is correct?
>
> Also when sending multiple versions of a patch series is it is
> best practice to include a revision history in the cover letter like:
>
>
> v2
> ip6/tunnel - incorporate review feedback in fou
>
> v3
> ip/gre - fix spelling errors
>
>
Ah, sorry for that inconvenience. Addressed with v4.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists