[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <397562a6-35ec-c5e4-b819-9931c1e5d86f@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2018 20:54:00 -0700
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: davem@...emloft.net, roopa@...ulusnetworks.com,
nikolay@...ulusnetworks.com, pch@...bogen.com, jkbs@...hat.com,
yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org, mlxsw@...lanox.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 3/4] ipv6: Use hash-threshold instead of modulo-N
On 1/9/18 7:40 AM, Ido Schimmel wrote:
> Now that each nexthop stores its region boundary in the multipath hash
> function's output space, we can use hash-threshold instead of modulo-N
> in multipath selection.
>
> This reduces the number of checks we need to perform during lookup, as
> dead and linkdown nexthops are assigned a negative region boundary. In
> addition, in contrast to modulo-N, only flows near region boundaries are
> affected when a nexthop is added or removed.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ido Schimmel <idosch@...lanox.com>
> ---
> net/ipv6/route.c | 36 +++++++++++++-----------------------
> 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
>
Did you consider adding the net->ipv4.sysctl_fib_multipath_use_neigh
check as well? ie., if set, verify neighbor is alive before picking that hop
Acked-by: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists