[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180111113746.28186-7-steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 12:37:41 +0100
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
To: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>,
<netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 06/11] xfrm: Use __skb_queue_tail in xfrm_trans_queue
From: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
We do not need locking in xfrm_trans_queue because it is designed
to use per-CPU buffers. However, the original code incorrectly
used skb_queue_tail which takes the lock. This patch switches
it to __skb_queue_tail instead.
Reported-and-tested-by: Artem Savkov <asavkov@...hat.com>
Fixes: acf568ee859f ("xfrm: Reinject transport-mode packets...")
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@...unet.com>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
index 3f6f6f8c9fa5..5b2409746ae0 100644
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_input.c
@@ -518,7 +518,7 @@ int xfrm_trans_queue(struct sk_buff *skb,
return -ENOBUFS;
XFRM_TRANS_SKB_CB(skb)->finish = finish;
- skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
+ __skb_queue_tail(&trans->queue, skb);
tasklet_schedule(&trans->tasklet);
return 0;
}
--
2.14.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists