[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a7e7cf35-634e-9e2f-2be8-753ed8617039@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 18:16:45 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: dvyukov@...gle.com, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch net v2] tun: fix a memory leak for tfile->tx_array
On 2018年01月11日 02:51, Cong Wang wrote:
> tfile->tun could be detached before we close the tun fd,
> via tun_detach_all(), so it should not be used to check for
> tfile->tx_array.
>
> As Jason suggested, we probably have to clean it up
> unconditionally, but this requires to check if it is initialized
> or not. Currently skb_array_cleanup() doesn't have such a check,
> so I check it in the caller, it is ugly but we can always
> improve it in net-next.
Rethink about this, looks like I was wrong. The case I mentioned
previously is
open
attach
detach
close
But during close, we will try to enable tfile through tun_enable_queue()
in __tun_detach(), which means we can do the cleanup for sure.
It looks to me what is actual missed is the cleanups tun_detach_all().
For me the only case that could leak is
open
attach
ip link del link dev tap0
close or another set_iff()
So in this case, clean during close is not sufficient since it could be
attached to another device.
Thanks
>
> Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> Fixes: 1576d9860599 ("tun: switch to use skb array for tx")
> Cc: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Cong Wang <xiyou.wangcong@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/net/tun.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/tun.c b/drivers/net/tun.c
> index 4f4a842a1c9c..4c85474ffbaf 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/tun.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/tun.c
> @@ -657,7 +657,7 @@ static void __tun_detach(struct tun_file *tfile, bool clean)
> tun->dev->reg_state == NETREG_REGISTERED)
> unregister_netdevice(tun->dev);
> }
> - if (tun)
> + if (tfile->tx_array.ring.queue)
> skb_array_cleanup(&tfile->tx_array);
> sock_put(&tfile->sk);
> }
> @@ -2851,6 +2851,8 @@ static int tun_chr_open(struct inode *inode, struct file * file)
>
> sock_set_flag(&tfile->sk, SOCK_ZEROCOPY);
>
> + memset(&tfile->tx_array, 0, sizeof(tfile->tx_array));
> +
> return 0;
> }
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists