[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20180112092758.2f42b460@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 09:27:58 +0100
From: Jiri Benc <jbenc@...hat.com>
To: William Tu <u9012063@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Network Developers <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Pravin B Shelar <pshelar@....org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 net-next 2/2] openvswitch: add erspan version II
support
On Thu, 11 Jan 2018 08:34:14 -0800, William Tu wrote:
> I'd also prefer reverting ceaa001a170e since it's more clean but I
> also hope to have this feature in 4.15.
> How long does reverting take? Am I only able to submit the new patch
> after the reverting is merged? Or I can submit revert and this new
> patch in one series? I have little experience in reverting, can you
> suggest which way is better?
Send the revert for net (subject will be "[PATCH net] revert:
openvswitch: Add erspan tunnel support."). Don't forget to explain why
you're proposing a revert.
After it is accepted and applied to net.git, wait until the patch
appears in net-next.git. It may take a little while. After that, send
the new patch(es) for net-next.
Jiri
Powered by blists - more mailing lists