netdev - Re: [bpf-next PATCH v3 3/7] bpf: sockmap sample, use fork() for send and recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180113073354.nmov2m5cvvf5r6hn@kafai-mbp>
Date:   Fri, 12 Jan 2018 23:33:54 -0800
From:   Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
To:     John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
CC:     <borkmann@...earbox.net>, <ast@...nel.org>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [bpf-next PATCH v3 3/7] bpf: sockmap sample, use fork() for send
 and recv

On Thu, Jan 11, 2018 at 09:06:54PM -0800, John Fastabend wrote:
> Currently for SENDMSG tests first send completes then recv runs. This
> does not work well for large data sizes and/or many iterations. So
> fork the recv and send handler so that we run both send and recv. In
> the future we can add a parameter to do more than a single fork of
> tx/rx.
> 
> With this we can get many GBps of data which helps exercise the
> sockmap code.
> 
> Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
One nit.

Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>

> ---
[ ... ]
> @@ -274,25 +275,50 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
>  
>  static int sendmsg_test(int iov_count, int iov_buf, int cnt, int verbose)
>  {
> +	int txpid, rxpid, err = 0;
>  	struct msg_stats s = {0};
> -	int err;
> -
> -	err = msg_loop(c1, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, true);
> -	if (err) {
> -		fprintf(stderr,
> -			"msg_loop_tx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
> -			iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
> -		return err;
> +	int status;
> +
> +	errno = 0;
> +
> +	rxpid = fork();
> +	if (rxpid == 0) {
> +		err = msg_loop(p2, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, false);
> +		if (err)
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +				"msg_loop_rx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
> +				iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "rx_sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
> +			s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
> +		shutdown(p2, SHUT_RDWR);
> +		shutdown(p1, SHUT_RDWR);
> +		exit(1);
> +	} else if (rxpid == -1) {
> +		perror("msg_loop_rx: ");
> +		return errno;
>  	}
>  
> -	msg_loop(p2, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, false);
> -	if (err)
> -		fprintf(stderr,
> -			"msg_loop_rx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
> -			iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
> +	txpid = fork();
> +	if (txpid == 0) {
> +		err = msg_loop(c1, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, true);
> +		if (err)
> +			fprintf(stderr,
> +				"msg_loop_tx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
> +				iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
> +		fprintf(stdout, "tx_sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
> +			s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
> +		shutdown(c1, SHUT_RDWR);
> +		exit(1);
> +	} else if (txpid == -1) {
> +		perror("msg_loop_tx: ");
> +		return errno;
> +	}
>  
> -	fprintf(stdout, "sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
> -		s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
> +	assert(waitpid(rxpid, &status, 0) == rxpid);
> +	if (!txpid)
This case won't be hit?

> +		goto out;
> +	assert(waitpid(txpid, &status, 0) == txpid);
> +out:
>  	return err;
>  }
>  
>