[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515807206.3606.4.camel@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 17:33:26 -0800
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, edumazet@...gle.com
Subject: [PATCH] bpf: fix divides by zero
From: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Divides by zero are not nice, lets avoid them if possible.
Also do_div() seems not needed when dealing with 32bit operands,
but this seems a minor detail.
Fixes: bd4cf0ed331a ("net: filter: rework/optimize internal BPF interpreter's instruction set")
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>
Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@...glegroups.com>
---
kernel/bpf/core.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/core.c b/kernel/bpf/core.c
index
51ec2dda7f08c6c90af084589bb6d80662c77d12..7949e8b8f94e9cc196e0449214493
ccce61b0903 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/core.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/core.c
@@ -956,7 +956,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs,
const struct bpf_insn *insn,
DST = tmp;
CONT;
ALU_MOD_X:
- if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+ if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
return 0;
tmp = (u32) DST;
DST = do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ static unsigned int ___bpf_prog_run(u64 *regs,
const struct bpf_insn *insn,
DST = div64_u64(DST, SRC);
CONT;
ALU_DIV_X:
- if (unlikely(SRC == 0))
+ if (unlikely((u32)SRC == 0))
return 0;
tmp = (u32) DST;
do_div(tmp, (u32) SRC);
Powered by blists - more mailing lists