netdev - Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_en: ensure rx_desc updating reaches HW before prod db updating

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <a40e44f4-106b-1075-8f92-f7741508372c@oracle.com>
Date:   Sun, 14 Jan 2018 10:40:10 +0800
From:   "jianchao.wang" <jianchao.w.wang@...cle.com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
Cc:     tariqt@...lanox.com, junxiao.bi@...cle.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/mlx4_en: ensure rx_desc updating reaches HW before
 prod db updating

Dear all

Thanks for the kindly response and reviewing. That's really appreciated.

On 01/13/2018 12:46 AM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>> Does this need to be dma_wmb(), and should it be in
>> mlx4_en_update_rx_prod_db ?
>>
> +1 on dma_wmb()
> 
> On what architecture bug was observed ?
This issue was observed on x86-64.
And I will send a new patch, in which replace wmb() with dma_wmb(), to customer
to confirm.

Thanks
Jianchao