[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1515969647.26804.33.camel@sipsolutions.net>
Date: Sun, 14 Jan 2018 23:40:47 +0100
From: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>
To: Dominik Brodowski <linux@...inikbrodowski.net>
Cc: regressions@...mhuis.info, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] nl80211: take RCU read lock when calling
ieee80211_bss_get_ie()
On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 23:22 +0100, Dominik Brodowski wrote:
>
> + rcu_read_lock();
> ssid_ie = ieee80211_bss_get_ie(&wdev->current_bss->pub,
> WLAN_EID_SSID);
> if (!ssid_ie)
> - break;
nit-picking now: that "break" here may have been easier before these
changes
> + goto nla_rcu_unlock;
> if (nla_put(msg, NL80211_ATTR_SSID, ssid_ie[1], ssid_ie + 2))
> - goto nla_put_failure_locked;
> + goto nla_put_failure_rcu_locked;
> + nla_rcu_unlock:
> + rcu_read_unlock();
> break;
but after, perhaps it's easier to just do
if (ssid_ie &&
nla_put(...)
goto nla_put_failure_rcu_locked;
and avoid the extra label (but yeah, it's getting late)
johannes
Powered by blists - more mailing lists