[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1516016986.2608.16.camel@baylibre.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:49:46 +0100
From: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
To: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, ingrassia@...genesys.com
Cc: linus.luessing@...3.blue, khilman@...libre.com,
linux-amlogic@...ts.infradead.org, narmstrong@...libre.com,
peppe.cavallaro@...com, alexandre.torgue@...com
Subject: Re: [RFT net-next v4 3/5] net: stmmac: dwmac-meson8b: fix internal
RGMII clock configuration
On Sun, 2018-01-14 at 22:48 +0100, Martin Blumenstingl wrote:
> Tests (using an oscilloscope and an Odroid-C1 board with a RTL8211F
> RGMII PHY) have shown that the PRG_ETH0 register behaves as follows:
> - bit 4 is a mux to choose between two parent clocks. according to the
> public S805 datasheet the only supported parent clock is MPLL2 (this
> was not verified using the oscilloscope).
> The public S805/S905 datasheet claims that this bit is reserved.
> - bits 9:7 control a one-based divider (register value 1 means "divide
> by 1", etc.) for the input clock. we call this clock the "m250_div"
> clock because it's value is always supposed to be (close to) 250MHz
> (see below for an explanation).
> The description in the public S805/S905 datasheet is a bit cryptic,
> but it comes down to "input clock = 250MHz * value" (which could also
> be expressed as "250MHz = input clock / value")
> - there seems to be an internal fixed divide-by-2 clock which takes the
> output from the m250_div and divides it by 2. This is not unusual on
> Amlogic SoCs, since the SDIO (MMC) driver also uses an internal fixed
> divide-by-2 clock.
> This is not documented in the public S805/S905 datasheet
> - bit 10 controls a gate clock which enables or disables the RGMII TX
> clock (which is an output on the MAC/SoC and an input in the PHY). we
> call this the "rgmii_tx_en" clock. if this bit is set to "0" the RGMII
> TX clock output is close to 0
> The description for this bit in the public S805/S905 datasheet is
> "Generate 25MHz clock for PHY". Based on these tests it's believed
> that this is wrong, and should probably read "Generate the 125MHz
> RGMII TX clock for the PHY"
> - the RGMII TX clock has to be set to 125MHz - the IP block adjusts the
> output (automatically) depending on the line speed (RGMII specifies
> that Gbit connections use a 125MHz clock, 100Mbit/s connections use a
> 25MHz clock and 10Mbit/s connections use a 2.5MHz clock. only Gbit and
> 100Mbit/s were tested with an oscilloscope). Due to the requirement
> that this clock always has to be set to 125MHz and due to the fixed
> divide-by-2 parent clock this means that m250_div will always end up
> with a rate of (close to) 250MHz.
> - bits 6:5 are the TX delay, which is also named "clock phase" in some
> of Amlogic's older GPL kernel sources.
>
> The PHY also has an XTAL_IN pin where a 25MHz clock has to be provided.
> Tests with the oscilloscope have shown that this is routed to a crystal
> right next to the RTL8211F PHY. The same seems to be true on the Khadas
> VIM2 (which uses a GXM SoC) board - however the 25MHz crystal is on the
> other side of the PCB there.
>
> This updates the clocks in the dwmac-meson8b driver by replacing the
> "m25_div" with the "rgmii_tx_en" clock and additionally introducing a
> fixed divide-by-2 clock between "m250_div" and "rgmii_tx_en".
> Now we also need to set a frequency of 125MHz on the RGMII clock
> (opposed to the 25MHz we set before, with that non-existing
> divide-by-5-or-10 divider).
>
> Special thanks go to Linus Lüssing for testing the various bits and
> checking the results with an oscilloscope on his Odroid-C1!
>
> Fixes: 566e8251625304 ("net: stmmac: add a glue driver for the Amlogic Meson 8b / GXBB DWMAC")
> Reported-by: Emiliano Ingrassia <ingrassia@...genesys.com>
> Signed-off-by: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
Looks Good
Acked-by: Jerome Brunet <jbrunet@...libre.com>
Not related to this particular change but we still need to re-factor the clock
registration of this driver. We carry a lot of useless pointers in our private
data. I guess this is something for another day.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists