[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20180115.125013.1494098943775766238.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 12:50:13 -0500 (EST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: andrew@...n.ch
Cc: geert@...ux-m68k.org, niklas.cassel@...s.com,
rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk, f.fainelli@...il.com,
netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net: phy: Have __phy_modify return 0 on success
From: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
Date: Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:01:36 +0100
> __phy_modify would return the old value of the register before it was
> modified. Thus on success, it does not return 0, but a positive value.
> Thus functions using phy_modify, which is a wrapper around
> __phy_modify, can start returning > 0 on success, rather than 0. As a
> result, breakage has been noticed in various places, where 0 was
> assumed.
>
> Code inspection does not find any current location where the return of
> the old value is currently used. So have __phy_modify return 0 on
> success. When there is a real need for the old value, either a new
> accessor can be added, or an additional parameter passed.
>
> Fixes: fea23fb591cc ("net: phy: convert read-modify-write to phy_modify()")
> Fixes: 2b74e5be17d2 ("net: phy: add phy_modify() accessor")
> Reported-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> Tested-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> v2: space before :
> additional fixes tag
> Tested-by
Applied to net-next, thanks Andrew.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists