[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <715ef97b-128e-3feb-a3e9-f6963cf0be49@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2018 14:54:22 -0800
From: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>, David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...oirfairelinux.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Free ATU/VTU irq only
when there is chip irq
On 01/15/2018 02:45 PM, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> We only register the ATU and VTU irq when we have a chip level IRQ.
> In the error path, we should only attempt to remove the ATU and VTU
> irq if we also have a chip level IRQ.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
> ---
> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c | 6 ++++--
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> index 54cb00a27408..eb328bade225 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx/chip.c
> @@ -3999,9 +3999,11 @@ static int mv88e6xxx_probe(struct mdio_device *mdiodev)
> out_mdio:
> mv88e6xxx_mdios_unregister(chip);
> out_g1_vtu_prob_irq:
> - mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free(chip);
> + if (chip->irq > 0)
> + mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free(chip);
Why not move this check to mv88e6xxx_g1_vtu_prob_irq_free() and make it
a no-op if chip->irq <= 0?
--
Florian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists