lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Jan 2018 09:53:14 +0200
From:   Eran Ben Elisha <eranlinuxmellanox@...il.com>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux-Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Eran Ben Elisha <eranbe@...lanox.com>,
        Saeed Mahameed <saeedm@...lanox.com>,
        Or Gerlitz <ogerlitz@...lanox.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the net-next tree with the net tree

On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 1:52 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the net-next tree got a conflict in:
>
>   include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
>
> between commit:
>
>   8978cc921fc7 ("{net,ib}/mlx5: Don't disable local loopback multicast traffic when needed")
>
> from the net tree and commit:
>
>   40817cdbb695 ("net/mlx5: Add hairpin definitions to the FW API")
>
> from the net-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.

sure, https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/859425/

>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> index 1391a82da98e,78e36fc2609e..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mlx5/mlx5_ifc.h
> @@@ -1027,9 -1035,10 +1035,10 @@@ struct mlx5_ifc_cmd_hca_cap_bits
>         u8         log_max_wq_sz[0x5];
>
>         u8         nic_vport_change_event[0x1];
>  -      u8         disable_local_lb[0x1];
>  -      u8         reserved_at_3e2[0x1];
>  +      u8         disable_local_lb_uc[0x1];
>  +      u8         disable_local_lb_mc[0x1];
> -       u8         reserved_at_3e3[0x8];
> +       u8         log_min_hairpin_wq_data_sz[0x5];
> +       u8         reserved_at_3e8[0x3];

Conflict fix looks good as proposed.

thanks for the fix,
Eran.

>         u8         log_max_vlan_list[0x5];
>         u8         reserved_at_3f0[0x3];
>         u8         log_max_current_mc_list[0x5];

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ