netdev - [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: offload: make bpf_offload_dev

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 16 Jan 2018 15:51:45 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     daniel@...earbox.net, alexei.starovoitov@...il.com
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, oss-drivers@...ronome.com,
        Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 1/6] bpf: offload: make bpf_offload_dev_match() reject host+host case

Daniel suggests it would be more logical for bpf_offload_dev_match()
to return false is either the program or the map are not offloaded,
rather than treating the both not offloaded case as a "matching
CPU/host device".

This makes no functional difference today, since verifier only calls
bpf_offload_dev_match() when one of the objects is offloaded.

Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 kernel/bpf/offload.c | 4 +---
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/bpf/offload.c b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
index 453785fa1881..a88cebf368bf 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/offload.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/offload.c
@@ -395,10 +395,8 @@ bool bpf_offload_dev_match(struct bpf_prog *prog, struct bpf_map *map)
 	struct bpf_prog_offload *offload;
 	bool ret;
 
-	if (!!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux) != !!bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map))
+	if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux) || !bpf_map_is_dev_bound(map))
 		return false;
-	if (!bpf_prog_is_dev_bound(prog->aux))
-		return true;
 
 	down_read(&bpf_devs_lock);
 	offload = prog->aux->offload;
-- 
2.15.1