netdev - [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] netdevsim: add extack support for TC eBPF offload

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 15 Jan 2018 18:08:44 -0800
From:   Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
To:     davem@...emloft.net, daniel@...earbox.net,
        alexei.starovoitov@...il.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     dsahern@...il.com, oss-drivers@...ronome.com, jiri@...nulli.us,
        john.fastabend@...il.com, jhs@...atatu.com, gerlitz.or@...il.com,
        aring@...atatu.com, xiyou.wangcong@...il.com,
        Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next v2 10/11] netdevsim: add extack support for TC eBPF offload

From: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>

Use the recently added extack support for TC eBPF filters in netdevsim.

Signed-off-by: Quentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@...ronome.com>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>
---
 drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c | 35 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
index 5134d5c1306c..0de8ba91b262 100644
--- a/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
+++ b/drivers/net/netdevsim/bpf.c
@@ -109,17 +109,35 @@ int nsim_bpf_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type,
 	struct netdevsim *ns = cb_priv;
 	struct bpf_prog *oldprog;
 
-	if (type != TC_SETUP_CLSBPF ||
-	    !tc_can_offload(ns->netdev) ||
-	    cls_bpf->common.protocol != htons(ETH_P_ALL) ||
-	    cls_bpf->common.chain_index)
+	if (type != TC_SETUP_CLSBPF) {
+		NSIM_EA(cls_bpf->common.extack,
+			"only offload of BPF classifiers supported");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (!tc_can_offload_extack(ns->netdev, cls_bpf->common.extack))
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+
+	if (cls_bpf->common.protocol != htons(ETH_P_ALL)) {
+		NSIM_EA(cls_bpf->common.extack,
+			"only ETH_P_ALL supported as filter protocol");
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	if (cls_bpf->common.chain_index)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-	if (!ns->bpf_tc_accept)
+	if (!ns->bpf_tc_accept) {
+		NSIM_EA(cls_bpf->common.extack,
+			"netdevsim configured to reject BPF TC offload");
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 	/* Note: progs without skip_sw will probably not be dev bound */
-	if (prog && !prog->aux->offload && !ns->bpf_tc_non_bound_accept)
+	if (prog && !prog->aux->offload && !ns->bpf_tc_non_bound_accept) {
+		NSIM_EA(cls_bpf->common.extack,
+			"netdevsim configured to reject unbound programs");
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
 
 	if (cls_bpf->command != TC_CLSBPF_OFFLOAD)
 		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -131,8 +149,11 @@ int nsim_bpf_setup_tc_block_cb(enum tc_setup_type type,
 		oldprog = NULL;
 		if (!cls_bpf->prog)
 			return 0;
-		if (ns->bpf_offloaded)
+		if (ns->bpf_offloaded) {
+			NSIM_EA(cls_bpf->common.extack,
+				"driver and netdev offload states mismatch");
 			return -EBUSY;
+		}
 	}
 
 	return nsim_bpf_offload(ns, cls_bpf->prog, oldprog);
-- 
2.15.1