lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 15 Jan 2018 19:59:05 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsa@...ulusnetworks.com>
To:     Marcelo Ricardo Leitner <marcelo.leitner@...il.com>,
        Stephen Hemminger <stephen@...workplumber.org>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>,
        Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: iproute2 net-next

On 1/15/18 6:56 PM, Marcelo Ricardo Leitner wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 08:00:28PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:
>> On Fri, 29 Dec 2017 09:58:23 +0100
>> Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us> wrote:
>>
>>> Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 12:46:31AM CET, daniel@...earbox.net wrote:
>>>> On 12/26/2017 10:35 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:  
>>>>> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:14:26PM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
>>>>>> On Tue, 26 Dec 2017 06:47:43 +0200
>>>>>> Leon Romanovsky <leon@...nel.org> wrote:
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> On Mon, Dec 25, 2017 at 10:49:19AM -0800, Stephen Hemminger wrote:  
>>>>>>>> David Ahern has agreed to take over managing the net-next branch of iproute2.
>>>>>>>> The new location is:
>>>>>>>>  https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/dsahern/iproute2-next.git/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> In the past, I have accepted new features into iproute2 master branch, but
>>>>>>>> am changing the policy so that outside of the merge window (up until -rc1)
>>>>>>>> new features will get put into net-next to get some more review and testing
>>>>>>>> time. This means that things like the proposed batch streaming mode will
>>>>>>>> go through net-next.  
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Did you consider to create one shared repo for the iproute2 to allow
>>>>>>> multiple committers workflow?  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For now having separate trees is best, there is no need for multiple
>>>>>> committers the load is very light.
>>>>>>  
>>>>>>> It will be much convenient for the users to have one place for
>>>>>>> master/stable/net-next branches, instead of actually following two
>>>>>>> different repositories.  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If you are doing network development, you already need to deal with
>>>>>> multiple repo's on the kernel side so there is no difference.  
>>>>>
>>>>> I agree with you that one extra "git remote add .." is not so huge and
>>>>> all people who develop for the netdev will do it. My concern is about
>>>>> Documentation and newcomers, who will have a hard time to find a right
>>>>> tree.  
>>>>
>>>> I guess it would certainly help to identify the official repo to rebase
>>>> against much quicker if it would be under a common group on korg e.g.
>>>>
>>>>  * iproute2/iproute2.git         - for current cycle
>>>>  * iproute2/iproute2-next.git    - for net-next bits
>>>>
>>>> and also be in line with other tooling (ethtool and others), even if
>>>> not as high volume, but it would make it unambiguous right away from
>>>> the other, private iproute2 repos on korg, imho. Just a thought.  
>>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> I was about to suggest this. This is nice opportunity to do such change.
>>>
>>>
>>>>  
>>>>>>> Example, of such shared repo:
>>>>>>> BPF: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next.git/
>>>>>>> Bluetooth: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bluetooth/bluetooth-next.git/
>>>>>>> RDMA: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git/  
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Most of these are high volume or vendor silo'd which is not the case here.  
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> Daniel  
>>
>> Good news
>> kup does support links so could make links from personal to iproute2 directory
>>
>> Bad news
>> kup won't allow me to make iproute2 directory right now. Will have to wait for
>> Konstantin
>>
> 
> Hi, any news on this? Not sure if Konstantin is back already or not.

Done a few days ago. The new canonical URLs for those repos are:
    pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2
    pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2-next

So clone URLs
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2-next.git
    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2-next.git
and
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git
    https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/network/iproute2/iproute2.git

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ