netdev - Re: DPAA Ethernet traffice troubles with Linux kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1516189651.18795.99.camel@infinera.com>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 11:47:33 +0000
From:   Joakim Tjernlund <Joakim.Tjernlund@...inera.com>
To:     "andrew@...n.ch" <andrew@...n.ch>
CC:     "linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
        "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        "madalin.bucur@....com" <madalin.bucur@....com>,
        "madskateman@...il.com" <madskateman@...il.com>
Subject: Re: DPAA Ethernet traffice troubles with Linux kernel

On Thu, 1970-01-01 at 00:00 +0000, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the content is safe.
> 
> 
> > > You appear to be using an old kernel. Take a look at:
> > 
> > Not really, I am using 4.14.x and I don't think that is old.
> 
> Development for 4.14 stopped somewhere around the beginning of
> September. So there has been over 4 months of work since then.  We are
> clearly interested in fixing bugs in that kernel, since it is the
> current stable version. But when reporting bugs, please let is know if
> the latest version of the network kernel,
> it://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git has
> the issue.
> 
> > Seems like this patch hasn't been sent to 4.14.x.
> 
> If it fixes a bug for you, please request the fix is added to stable.

That doesn't work really, having users to hit the bug, debug it, fix it and then
find it fixed already in upstream, then specifically request it to be backported to stable. 
I don't need this fix to be backported, already got it. Someone else might though.

I would be interested in bug fixes upstream which fixes:

libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
iommu: Adding device ffe488000.port to group 10
libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
mdio_bus ffe4e1000: Error while reading PHY0 reg at 3.3
iommu: Adding device ffe489000.port to group 22
libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
mdio_bus ffe4e3000: Error while reading PHY0 reg at 3.3
iommu: Adding device ffe48a000.port to group 23
libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
mdio_bus ffe4e5000: Error while reading PHY0 reg at 3.3
iommu: Adding device ffe48b000.port to group 24
libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
mdio_bus ffe4e7000: Error while reading PHY0 reg at 3.3
iommu: Adding device ffe48c000.port to group 25
libphy: Freescale XGMAC MDIO Bus: probed
mdio_bus ffe4e9000: Error while reading PHY0 reg at 3.3
fsl_mac ffe4e2000.ethernet: FMan MEMAC
fsl_mac ffe4e2000.ethernet: FMan MAC address: 00:06:9c:0b:06:20
fsl_mac dpaa-ethernet.0: __devm_request_mem_region(mac) failed
fsl_mac: probe of dpaa-ethernet.0 failed with error -16
fsl_mac ffe4e4000.ethernet: FMan MEMAC
fsl_mac ffe4e4000.ethernet: FMan MAC address: 00:06:9c:0b:06:21
fsl_mac dpaa-ethernet.1: __devm_request_mem_region(mac) failed
fsl_mac: probe of dpaa-ethernet.1 failed with error -16
fsl_mac ffe4e6000.ethernet: FMan MEMAC
fsl_mac ffe4e6000.ethernet: FMan MAC address: 00:06:9c:0b:06:22
fsl_mac dpaa-ethernet.2: __devm_request_mem_region(mac) failed

Every FMAN eth I/F with a fixed link fails mysteriously.
Custom board based on t1040rdb, been over the device tree and I cannot find any significant
changes.

 Jocke