netdev - Re: [PATCH][devlink-next] devlink: make functions a couple of new functions static

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180117153544.GG2114@nanopsycho>
Date:   Wed, 17 Jan 2018 16:35:44 +0100
From:   Jiri Pirko <jiri@...nulli.us>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Jiri Pirko <jiri@...lanox.com>,
        "David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH][devlink-next] devlink: make functions a couple of new
 functions static

Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 12:23:03PM CET, colin.king@...onical.com wrote:
>From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
>The functions devlink_resource_find and devlink_resource_validate_children
>are local to the source and do not need to be in global scope, so make
>them static.
>
>Cleans up sparse warnings:
>symbol 'devlink_resource_find' was not declared. Should it be static?
>warning: symbol 'devlink_resource_validate_children' was not declared.
>Should it be static?
>
>Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>

This is already submitted here:
http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/862020/