lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Thu, 18 Jan 2018 14:40:59 -0800
From:   Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...com>
To:     Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>, <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:     <daniel@...earbox.net>, <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        <netdev@...r.kernel.org>, <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf] bpf: fix 32-bit divide by zero

On 1/18/18 2:30 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Fri, 2018-01-12 at 18:59 -0800, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
>> due to some JITs doing if (src_reg == 0) check in 64-bit mode
>> for div/mod opreations mask upper 32-bits of src register
>> before doing the check
>>
>
> Is the plan to fix JIT, and if they can all be fixed,
> revert this patch ?

No need to fix JITs.
I'd rather remove 'cmp rX, 0' from JITs and let verifier emit it.
It's more generic and gives us flexibility to decide what to do
with divide by zero and other exceptions.


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ