| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20180118230851.1533009-3-yhs@fb.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2018 15:08:51 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: <ast@...com>, <daniel@...earbox.net>, <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
CC: <kernel-team@...com>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 2/2] tools/bpf: add a testcase for MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command of LPM_TRIE map
A test case is added in tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
for MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY command. A four node trie, which
is described in kernel/bpf/lpm_trie.c, is built and the
MAP_GET_NEXT_KEY results are checked.
Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c | 122 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 122 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
index f614806..0815108 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_lpm_map.c
@@ -521,6 +521,126 @@ static void test_lpm_delete(void)
close(map_fd);
}
+static void test_lpm_get_next_key(void)
+{
+ struct bpf_lpm_trie_key *key_p, *next_key_p;
+ size_t key_size;
+ __u32 value = 0;
+ int map_fd;
+
+ key_size = sizeof(*key_p) + sizeof(__u32);
+ key_p = alloca(key_size);
+ next_key_p = alloca(key_size);
+
+ map_fd = bpf_create_map(BPF_MAP_TYPE_LPM_TRIE, key_size, sizeof(value),
+ 100, BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC);
+ assert(map_fd >= 0);
+
+ /* empty tree. get_next_key should return ENOENT */
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ /* get and verify the first key, get the second one should fail. */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 16;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", key_p->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, key_p, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ memset(key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == 0);
+ assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ key_p->data[1] == 168);
+
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ /* no exact matching key should get the first one in post order. */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 8;
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == 0);
+ assert(key_p->prefixlen == 16 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ key_p->data[1] == 168);
+
+ /* add one more element (total two) */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.0.0", key_p->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, key_p, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ memset(key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == 0);
+ assert(key_p->prefixlen == 24 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ key_p->data[1] == 168 && key_p->data[2] == 0);
+
+ memset(next_key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 16 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ /* Add one more element (total three) */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.128.0", key_p->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, key_p, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ memset(key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == 0);
+ assert(key_p->prefixlen == 24 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ key_p->data[1] == 168 && key_p->data[2] == 0);
+
+ memset(next_key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 24 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168 && next_key_p->data[2] == 128);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 16 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ /* Add one more element (total four) */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 24;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.1.0", key_p->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_update_elem(map_fd, key_p, &value, 0) == 0);
+
+ memset(key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, NULL, key_p) == 0);
+ assert(key_p->prefixlen == 24 && key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ key_p->data[1] == 168 && key_p->data[2] == 0);
+
+ memset(next_key_p, 0, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 24 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168 && next_key_p->data[2] == 1);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 24 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168 && next_key_p->data[2] == 128);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 16 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168);
+
+ memcpy(key_p, next_key_p, key_size);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == -1 &&
+ errno == ENOENT);
+
+ /* no exact matching key should return the first one in post order */
+ key_p->prefixlen = 22;
+ inet_pton(AF_INET, "192.168.1.0", key_p->data);
+ assert(bpf_map_get_next_key(map_fd, key_p, next_key_p) == 0);
+ assert(next_key_p->prefixlen == 24 && next_key_p->data[0] == 192 &&
+ next_key_p->data[1] == 168 && next_key_p->data[2] == 0);
+
+ close(map_fd);
+}
+
int main(void)
{
struct rlimit limit = { RLIM_INFINITY, RLIM_INFINITY };
@@ -545,6 +665,8 @@ int main(void)
test_lpm_delete();
+ test_lpm_get_next_key();
+
printf("test_lpm: OK\n");
return 0;
}
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists