netdev - Re: [PATCH net v2] gso: validate gso_type if SKB_GSO

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAF=yD-+uLDhP1HaWW7tDs=0SN2be5O9FjL6yfZy5Ca1yXZZa5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:27:33 -0500
From:   Willem de Bruijn <willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
        Tom Herbert <tom@...bertland.com>,
        Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
        Willem de Bruijn <willemb@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2] gso: validate gso_type if SKB_GSO_DODGY

On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Willem de Bruijn
<willemdebruijn.kernel@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 7:36 AM, Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 2018年01月19日 08:19, Willem de Bruijn wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Willem de Bruijn<willemb@...gle.com>
>>>
>>> Validate gso_type during segmentation as SKB_GSO_DODGY sources
>>> may pass packets where the gso_type does not match the contents.
>>>
>>> Syzkaller was able to enter the SCTP gso handler with a packet of
>>> gso_type SKB_GSO_TCPV4.
>>>
>>> On entry of transport layer gso handlers, verify that the gso_type
>>> matches the transport protocol.
>>>
>>> Fixes: f43798c27684 ("tun: Allow GSO using virtio_net_hdr")
>>> Link:http://lkml.kernel.org/r/<001a1137452496ffc305617e5fe0@...gle.com>
>>> Reported-by:syzbot+fee64147a25aecd48055@...kaller.appspotmail.com
>>> Signed-off-by: Willem de Bruijn<willemb@...gle.com>
>>
>>
>> Thanks, just two nits:
>>
>> 1) I still suspect the "Fixes" is not accurate, should it be the commit of
>> sctp offloading?
>
> That commit c5c4e45c4b79 ("sctp: fix GSO for IPv6") is older than the
> equivalent for ESP, so catches both protocols that were added since the
> TSO checks were removed.

pasted the wrong commit. I meant 90017accff61 ("sctp: Add GSO support")