[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <0eadb528-9d82-3e0d-dc21-cd61244900e5@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:   Fri, 19 Jan 2018 09:35:59 +0100
From:   Ursula Braun <ubraun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:     "Gustavo A. R. Silva" <garsilva@...eddedor.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc:     linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] smc: return boolean instead of integer in using_ipsec
On 01/19/2018 12:33 AM, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote:
> Return statements in functions returning bool should use
> true/false instead of 1/0.
> 
> This issue was detected with the help of Coccinelle.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <garsilva@...eddedor.com>
> ---
>  net/smc/smc.h | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/net/smc/smc.h b/net/smc/smc.h
> index 0bee9d1..ef13af4 100644
> --- a/net/smc/smc.h
> +++ b/net/smc/smc.h
> @@ -258,7 +258,7 @@ static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>  #else
>  static inline bool using_ipsec(struct smc_sock *smc)
>  {
> -	return 0;
> +	return false;
>  }
>  #endif
> 
Gustavo,
thanks for reporting, but your improvement seems to be incomplete. Besides changing
line 260 of net/smc/smc.h, line 255 should be adapted the same way. Will you
come up with a second patch version here?
Kind regards, Ursula Braun
Powered by blists - more mailing lists
 
