| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <20180120002437.3528-5-daniel@iogearbox.net>
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2018 01:24:32 +0100
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
To: ast@...nel.org
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Subject: [PATCH bpf-next 4/9] bpf: add couple of test cases for div/mod by zero
Add couple of missing test cases for eBPF div/mod by zero to the
new test_verifier prog runtime feature. Also one for an empty prog
and only exit.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>
Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c | 87 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 87 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
index 6c22edb..efca10d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_verifier.c
@@ -102,6 +102,93 @@ static struct bpf_test tests[] = {
.retval = -3,
},
{
+ "DIV32 by 0, zero check 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "DIV32 by 0, zero check 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "DIV64 by 0, zero check",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_DIV, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "MOD32 by 0, zero check 1",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "MOD32 by 0, zero check 2",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_LD_IMM64(BPF_REG_1, 0xffffffff00000000LL),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU32_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "MOD64 by 0, zero check",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_0, 42),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_1, 0),
+ BPF_MOV32_IMM(BPF_REG_2, 1),
+ BPF_ALU64_REG(BPF_MOD, BPF_REG_2, BPF_REG_1),
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .result = ACCEPT,
+ .retval = 0,
+ },
+ {
+ "empty prog",
+ .insns = {
+ },
+ .errstr = "last insn is not an exit or jmp",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
+ "only exit insn",
+ .insns = {
+ BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
+ },
+ .errstr = "R0 !read_ok",
+ .result = REJECT,
+ },
+ {
"unreachable",
.insns = {
BPF_EXIT_INSN(),
--
2.9.5
Powered by blists - more mailing lists