[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1516641978-24269-6-git-send-email-serhe.popovych@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 19:26:15 +0200
From: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
To: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH iproute2-next 5/8] ipneigh: Use get_addr_rta()
Setting ->family in @inet_prefix seems pointless:
inet_addr_match() does not consider it's value:
better is to force get_addr_rta() to use address
family from filter to ensure we get correct one.
Signed-off-by: Serhey Popovych <serhe.popovych@...il.com>
---
ip/ipneigh.c | 14 +++++++-------
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/ip/ipneigh.c b/ip/ipneigh.c
index 11f280d..d9de935 100644
--- a/ip/ipneigh.c
+++ b/ip/ipneigh.c
@@ -234,14 +234,14 @@ int print_neigh(const struct sockaddr_nl *who, struct nlmsghdr *n, void *arg)
parse_rtattr(tb, NDA_MAX, NDA_RTA(r), n->nlmsg_len - NLMSG_LENGTH(sizeof(*r)));
- if (tb[NDA_DST]) {
- if (filter.pfx.family) {
- inet_prefix dst = { .family = r->ndm_family };
+ if (filter.pfx.family && tb[NDA_DST]) {
+ struct rtattr *rta = tb[NDA_DST];
+ inet_prefix dst, *f_pfx = &filter.pfx;
- memcpy(&dst.data, RTA_DATA(tb[NDA_DST]), RTA_PAYLOAD(tb[NDA_DST]));
- if (inet_addr_match(&dst, &filter.pfx, filter.pfx.bitlen))
- return 0;
- }
+ if (get_addr_rta(&dst, rta, f_pfx->family))
+ return 0;
+ if (inet_addr_match(&dst, f_pfx, f_pfx->bitlen))
+ return 0;
}
if (filter.unused_only && tb[NDA_CACHEINFO]) {
struct nda_cacheinfo *ci = RTA_DATA(tb[NDA_CACHEINFO]);
--
1.7.10.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists