netdev - [bpf-next PATCH v4 3/7] bpf: sockmap sample, use fork() for send and recv

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20180122183602.11150.62251.stgit@john-Precision-Tower-5810>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 10:36:02 -0800
From:   John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
To:     borkmann@...earbox.net, kafai@...com, ast@...nel.org
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, brouer@...hat.com
Subject: [bpf-next PATCH v4 3/7] bpf: sockmap sample,
 use fork() for send and recv

Currently for SENDMSG tests first send completes then recv runs. This
does not work well for large data sizes and/or many iterations. So
fork the recv and send handler so that we run both send and recv. In
the future we can add a parameter to do more than a single fork of
tx/rx.

With this we can get many GBps of data which helps exercise the
sockmap code.

Signed-off-by: John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>
Acked-by: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>
---
 samples/sockmap/sockmap_user.c |   55 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-)

diff --git a/samples/sockmap/sockmap_user.c b/samples/sockmap/sockmap_user.c
index ccc7173..6ab3ec2 100644
--- a/samples/sockmap/sockmap_user.c
+++ b/samples/sockmap/sockmap_user.c
@@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
 #include <stdbool.h>
 #include <signal.h>
 #include <fcntl.h>
+#include <sys/wait.h>
 
 #include <sys/time.h>
 #include <sys/types.h>
@@ -195,7 +196,7 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 {
 	struct msghdr msg = {0};
 	struct iovec *iov;
-	int i, flags = 0;
+	int i, flags = MSG_NOSIGNAL;
 
 	iov = calloc(iov_count, sizeof(struct iovec));
 	if (!iov)
@@ -275,25 +276,47 @@ static int msg_loop(int fd, int iov_count, int iov_length, int cnt,
 
 static int sendmsg_test(int iov_count, int iov_buf, int cnt, int verbose)
 {
+	int txpid, rxpid, err = 0;
 	struct msg_stats s = {0};
-	int err;
-
-	err = msg_loop(c1, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, true);
-	if (err) {
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			"msg_loop_tx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
-			iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
-		return err;
+	int status;
+
+	errno = 0;
+
+	rxpid = fork();
+	if (rxpid == 0) {
+		err = msg_loop(p2, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, false);
+		if (err)
+			fprintf(stderr,
+				"msg_loop_rx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
+				iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
+		fprintf(stdout, "rx_sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
+			s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
+		shutdown(p2, SHUT_RDWR);
+		shutdown(p1, SHUT_RDWR);
+		exit(1);
+	} else if (rxpid == -1) {
+		perror("msg_loop_rx: ");
+		return errno;
 	}
 
-	err = msg_loop(p2, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, false);
-	if (err)
-		fprintf(stderr,
-			"msg_loop_rx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
-			iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
+	txpid = fork();
+	if (txpid == 0) {
+		err = msg_loop(c1, iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, &s, true);
+		if (err)
+			fprintf(stderr,
+				"msg_loop_tx: iov_count %i iov_buf %i cnt %i err %i\n",
+				iov_count, iov_buf, cnt, err);
+		fprintf(stdout, "tx_sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
+			s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
+		shutdown(c1, SHUT_RDWR);
+		exit(1);
+	} else if (txpid == -1) {
+		perror("msg_loop_tx: ");
+		return errno;
+	}
 
-	fprintf(stdout, "sendmsg: TX_bytes %zu RX_bytes %zu\n",
-		s.bytes_sent, s.bytes_recvd);
+	assert(waitpid(rxpid, &status, 0) == rxpid);
+	assert(waitpid(txpid, &status, 0) == txpid);
 	return err;
 }