netdev - Re: [PATCH v6 06/36] nds32: Kernel booting and initialization

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAEbi=3dF-ekx8oz0vjd3WfM7qO755rW46Q=+i-MnQC=4N1=EMA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 22 Jan 2018 17:49:30 +0800
From:   Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com>
To:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Cc:     Greentime <greentime@...estech.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Jason Cooper <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Networking <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Chen <deanbo422@...il.com>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
        Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
        Geert Uytterhoeven <geert.uytterhoeven@...il.com>,
        Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>,
        Guo Ren <ren_guo@...ky.com>,
        Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>,
        Stefan Kristiansson <stefan.kristiansson@...nalahti.fi>,
        Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>,
        Vincent Chen <vincentc@...estech.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 06/36] nds32: Kernel booting and initialization

2018-01-20 0:41 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 5:34 PM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>> Hi, Arnd:
>>
>> 2018-01-18 18:11 GMT+08:00 Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>:
>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 6:53 AM, Greentime Hu <green.hu@...il.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I had not looked at this patch in enough detail earlier, sorry about
>>> that. It should be
>>> easy enough to fix though.
>>>
>>>> +#ifdef CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE
>>>> +struct screen_info screen_info;
>>>> +#endif
>>>
>>> I would assume that you can't ever have a VGA console. Just drop all
>>> the references
>>> here and instead send a patch to the fbdev maintainer to add the dependency
>>> at CONFIG_VGA_CONSOLE to prevent selecting it with nds32.
>>
>> I found it can be built pass for now because we disable it in defconfig.
>> Should I send the patch in v7 series?
>
> yes, I think that would be best.
>
>>>> +
>>>> +extern void __init early_init_devtree(void *params);
>>>> +extern void __init early_trap_init(void);
>>>
>>> similarly, these are declared in include/linux/of_fdt.h
>>>
>>
>> early_trap_init is a nds32 function. I will move it to nds32.h
>
> Right, makes sense.
>
>>>> +void calibrate_delay(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> +       const int *val;
>>>> +       struct device_node *cpu = NULL;
>>>> +       cpu = of_find_compatible_node(NULL, NULL, "andestech,nds32v3");
>>>> +       val = of_get_property(cpu, "clock-frequency", NULL);
>>>> +       if (!val || !*val)
>>>> +               panic("no cpu 'clock-frequency' parameter in device tree");
>>>> +       loops_per_jiffy = be32_to_cpup(val) / HZ;
>>>> +       pr_cont("%lu.%02lu BogoMIPS (lpj=%lu)\n",
>>>> +               loops_per_jiffy / (500000 / HZ),
>>>> +               (loops_per_jiffy / (5000 / HZ)) % 100, loops_per_jiffy);
>>>> +}
>>>
>>> This seems very odd to me: The 'clock-frequency' property in the
>>> cpu node should refer to the actual frequency it is running at, but that
>>> tends to be different from the bogomips as needed by the ndelay()
>>> function. Can you explain what is going on here?
>>>
>>
>> This implementation is referenced from openrisc.
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2017/11/17/228
>
> It's correct on openrisc, because that has a reliable cycle counter,
> and that gets used in its delay function:
>
> void __delay(unsigned long cycles)
> {
>         cycles_t start = get_cycles();
>         while ((get_cycles() - start) < cycles)
>                 cpu_relax();
> }
>
> In my review comment that you cited, I assumed that nds32 had similar
> hardware.
>
> However, as you explained earlier, the nds32 architecture does not provide
> a cycle counter and the clocksource resolution is not high enough to
> be a good replacement, so you have to use the traditional delay
> calibration.
>

Hi, Arnd:

Thank you for your explanation.
Will it be ok if I code it like this?

config GENERIC_CALIBRATE_DELAY
       def_bool y